- Personal Injury Lawyer
- Case Settlements
In 1980, 13 year old softball all-star Cari Lightner was killed in Fair Oaks, California when she and a friend were walking to a church carnival. A drunk driver who had been released from jail just two days prior on his fourth DUI hit Cari from behind, throwing her 125 feet, then fled the scene. He was later found and charged with her death.
Cari’s mother, Candace Lightner, was determined to change drunk driving laws in California and make sense of an otherwise senseless act. She turned her pain into purpose that year when she founded Mother’s Against Drunk Drivers, commonly known as MADD (which now stands for Mother Against Drunk Driving).
Cindy Lamb of Maryland, herself and her daughter victims of a head-on drunk driving collision, joined Lightner in the cause. With the rise of drug use and drug-impaired driving, the mission statement of MADD changed in 2015 to incorporate driving while under the influence of other substances, i.e. drugs.
The mission of Mothers Against Drunk Driving is to end drunk driving, help fight drugged driving, support the victims of these violent crimes and prevent underage drinking.”
The drunk driving statistics posted by MADD are startling:
As a result of the sobering facts related to driving under the influence, MADD launched The Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving in 2006. There has been positive public response in support of the campaign, which is comprised of the following three areas.
MADD publicly supports law enforcement officers in their efforts to crack down on drunk driving, especially through sobriety checkpoints. These checkpoints have proven highly effective in getting drunk drivers off the street.
This is an initiative that requires ignition interlocking devices (i.e. in-car breathalyzers) for all those convicted of drunk driving to show that they are sober before they are even allowed to start the car. These devices are connected to the ignition and will not allow the car to start until the driver establishes that they are not impaired.
MADD works with a coalition of government, traffic safety advocates, and members of the automotive industry to support the development of new technology that would prevent drivers from operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The result is DADSS, or Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety.
MADD provides many suggestions for individuals to help reduce drunk driving accidents, such as:
MADD provides supportive services to victims of intoxicated driving to help them cope. (If you are a victim or know someone who is, you can call 1-877-MADD-HELP to speak to an advocate day or night). They offer help by:
By the year 2013, 25 out of 50 states had mandatory ignition interlock devices incorporated into the punishment phase for those convicted of drunk driving. All 50 states have some form of this as well.
California launched the pilot program requiring interlock devices for all convicted drunk drivers in Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Tulare counties, which encompassed about 13 million people. MADD urged California law makers to take action and pass SB61, expanding the pilot program to the entire state. Currently, taxpayer subsidy of drunk driving fatalities is about $5.4 billion in California.
MADD makes it extremely simple to lobby your state representative and to support proposed anti-drunk driving legislation with online petitions. M.A.D.D. has Teen Influencer Groups designed to equip teens with the information and resources to help them avoid drinking alcohol before 21.
It’s easy. There are a variety of ways to get involved with MADD online, by giving charitably, fundraising, staying informed, and submitting a volunteer application. And if you or someone you love has been the victim of a drunk driving accident, or any other car accident, contact our offices without delay.
If a negligent driver causes a commercial truck accident, the trucking company can be burdened with vicarious liability torts. The company can be held liable for the driver’s negligence under the legal tenet known as respondeat superior, a Latin phrase that translates as “let the superior make the response.” This concept transfers the truck driver’s […]
Tort liability in personal injury cases is most often based on acts of negligence, but there are exceptions. Sometimes the responsible party is held to the strict liability tort standard, meaning that a finding of negligence or malicious intent is not required. The most common types of strict liability tort cases are based on: Product […]
A negligence-based lawsuit against a school can have unique complications, depending on the type of institution it is. Overall, teachers, school administrators, and other staff have a “duty of care,” meaning they must take reasonable steps to avoid and prevent circumstances likely to cause personal injury to a student. Some reasons you might want to […]