Roche May Cause Pharmaceutical Injury

pharmaceutical injury

Roche Pharmaceutical may face fines if charged with allegations of not properly researching medication side effects.  If charged with these allegations, Roche could be fined up to five percent of their 13.8 billion European Union turnover.

Pharmaceutical Company Fails to Report Side Effects

The investigation began during a routine inspection in June, when the Swiss based company was found to have failed to adequately assess 80,000 cases of adverse drug side effects.

More recently, The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has begun an infringement procedure against Roche alleging the possibility of pharmaceutical injury and that the company has not complied with its legal obligations.  The pharmaceutical company was part of a reimbursement program that helps United States patients pay for Roche’s drugs that they otherwise could not afford.

Drug Safety Reporting May Prevent Pharmaceutical Injury

Of the 80,000 reported cases, 15,000 deaths were reported.  Those tragic deaths, which may have linked to the drugs, prompted the immediate investigation.  The issue of drug safety reporting will need further research to determine if the deaths of the patients were immediately related to the Roche drugs.

Roche is cooperating in the investigation and claims that to date no impact on the safety of any of its products has been found. They also state that there has been no indication of negative impacts on the benefit- risk balance to patients.

A Pharmaceutical injury is not your fault.  Patients must know their rights and stand up against neglectful actions.  If you or someone you know has been adversely affected by prescription medications, contact Sacramento Pharmaceutical Attorney, Frank D. Penny today.

Recent Blog Posts

  • commercial trucks on highway

    Vicarious Liability Torts in Commercial Truck Accidents

    If a negligent driver causes a commercial truck accident, the trucking company can be burdened with vicarious liability torts. The company can be held liable for the driver’s negligence under the legal tenet known as respondeat superior, a Latin phrase that translates as “let the superior make the response.” This concept transfers the truck driver’s […]

    Read More
  • california fire possibly caused by utility company under strict liability

    3 Fascinating Strict Liability Tort Cases in Sacramento

    Tort liability in personal injury cases is most often based on acts of negligence, but there are exceptions. Sometimes the responsible party is held to the strict liability tort standard, meaning that a finding of negligence or malicious intent is not required. The most common types of strict liability tort cases are based on: Product […]

    Read More
  • student injured at school - parents suing for negligence

    Suing a School for Negligence: What You Need to Know

    A negligence-based lawsuit against a school can have unique complications, depending on the type of institution it is. Overall, teachers, school administrators, and other staff have a “duty of care,” meaning they must take reasonable steps to avoid and prevent circumstances likely to cause personal injury to a student. Some reasons you might want to […]

    Read More
  • Sacramento Office
  • 333 University Avenue, Suite 200
  • Sacramento, CA
  • (916) 756-0772
  • Roseville Office
  • 1544 Eureka Road, Suite 120
  • Roseville, CA
  • (916) 788-1960
  • Oakland Office
  • 1300 Clay St, Suite 600
  • Oakland, CA
  • (510) 962-4610

© 2019 Frank Penney Injury Lawyers, Serving the Areas of Sacramento, Roseville, Fairfield, Modesto, Stockton & Oakland California