Penney Law

Personal Injury Law Firm for Northern California specializing in car accident, motorcycle accident, truck accident and wrongful death cases.

916.756.0768

877.550.4786

social-facebooksocial-twittersocial-linkedin

  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Wrongful Death
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Videos
    • Testimonials
    • Demand Letter Guide
    • Traffic Accident Infographic
    • Teen Car Accident Infographic
    • FAQ
  • Case Results
  • Our Team
    • Frank D. Penney
    • James R. Lewis
    • Priscilla M. Parker
    • Joshua Boyce
    • Paul J. Hoybjerg
  • Contact Us
    • Roseville Office
    • Sacramento Office
    • Oakland Office
    • Fairfield Office
    • Modesto Office
    • Stockton Office
You are here: Home / Personal Injury Lawyer / Defective Product Liability Attorney

Defective Product Liability Attorney

About Defective Product Liability

The law of product deals with the responsibility of the manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer of an item for injuries resulting from dangerous and flawed items. These items subject to the law run the spectrum from food, drugs, appliances, automobiles, medical devices, medical implants, blood, tobacco, and even commercial jets.

At common law, the sale of any item is viewed as a commercial transaction at which only the parties of the commercial contract can sue. The law has evolved, and today, virtually anyone injured by a “defective” item (which is unreasonably dangerous for its intended use) can bring an action for damages against any party in the distributive chain of the product, whether it be the manufacturer, the wholesaler, the retailer, or even the maker of a component part.

Product Liability & Negligence

A basic negligence claim consists of proof of the following:

  • A duty owed on the part of the manufacturer
  • A breach of that duty
  • That the breach caused the plaintiff’s injury
  • An injury itself

A product’s liability negligence claim usually falls into one of three possible types:

  • Design defect
  • Manufacturing defect
  • Failure to warn

Over time, several other negligence concepts have arisen to deal with certain specific situations, including negligence per se (using a manufacturer’s violation of a law or regulation in place of proof of a duty and a breach) and res ipsa loquitur (an inference of negligence under certain conditions). The difficulties of an injured customer to prove what a manufacturer did or did not do during the design or manufacture of an item has led to the development of newer accountability claims such as strict liability.

Product Liability & Strict Liability

Rather than focus on the behavior of the manufacturer (as in negligence), strict liability claims focus on the unit itself. The basic component of this is proof that the unit is impaired or unreasonably dangerous. Similar to negligence claims, these claims may attack a product’s design, manufacture, or warnings. The various U.S. states have employed numerous ways to determine an item’s deficiency. Most of the tests used to determine impairments include concepts such as:

  • Consumer expectations (Consumer Expectations Test)
  • Balancing of the object’s risk and its utility (Risk-Utility Test)
  • Obviousness of the danger (Open and Obvious Danger Rule)
  • Existence of a safer design alternative (Feasible/Reasonable Design Alternative)
  • Sophistication of the object’s user (Sophisticated User Doctrine)
  • Existence of knowledgeable intermediaries between the manufacturer and the user (Learned Intermediary Doctrine)

Strict liability for defective units has often been criticized as an extremely harsh doctrine that imposes high accountability costs upon manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and almost anyone else in the chain of commerce. This is one of the primary reasons why warning labels have become so ubiquitous on modern products.

Nonetheless strict liability has become the overwhelming majority rule in the United States, due to the widespread agreement that it is the only way to ensure that such parties will always take all reasonable measures to protect the consumer because they know they will always be liable for any harm caused by the item.

Your Defective Product Case- There is Help

It is important to know what to do to protect the legal rights of yourself and your loved ones. Selecting the right personal injury attorney is an important decision. You should choose someone who is experienced, aggressive, and dedicated to obtaining fair compensation for your defective product injury. We have successfully handled thousands of injury cases, which is why you should contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer Frank D. Penney.

Contact Us

Get a Free Case Evaluation
You are missing compensation that you deserve. Click the link above to get a free case evaluation.
-Frank Penney

Site Search

Better Business Bureau
A+ Rating



Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Sacramento Office
333 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA
(916) 756-0772
Roseville Office
1544 Eureka Road, Suite 120
Roseville, CA
(916) 788-1960
Oakland Office
1300 Clay St, Suite 600
Oakland, CA
(510) 962-4610

 

© 2018 Frank Penney Injury Lawyers, Serving the Areas of Sacramento, Roseville, Fairfield, Modesto, Stockton & Oakland California
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Case Results
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Personal Injury Case Testimonials

Copyright © 2018 · Epik Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in